![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:18 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I got to the
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
too late for anyone to see
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
, but I feel compelled to point out that a car with a removable center roof panel and a fixed back half of the roof is not a roadster. It’s a targa.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:30 |
|
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:30 |
|
The first one was a targa too.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:30 |
|
Well, a roadster isn’t supposed to have any roof at all. Also, the roadster part of the name is the model of the car.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:31 |
|
Well yes but
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:37 |
|
Remember, Rover called this a coupe.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:38 |
|
![]() 11/17/2017 at 10:41 |
|
The original definition of roadster like pre-WWII was that but basically from the 50s on up most roadsters have been 2-seat convertibles.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 11:00 |
|
Words have no meaning anymore. Amirite, tree six beam leopard dance moon!
![]() 11/17/2017 at 11:18 |
|
Targster
![]() 11/17/2017 at 11:21 |
|
Yeah, roadsters are two-seaters, too. I’m a little perplexed by Tesla’s decision to stick an extra pair of seats in this car.
![]() 11/17/2017 at 18:57 |
|
You’ve been ripped off:
https://jalopnik.com/the-new-tesla-roadster-isn-t-actually-a-roadster-1820545274
![]() 11/17/2017 at 18:58 |
|
I only saw it after there were 100+ comments. Probably too late to demand an h/t.
![]() 11/19/2017 at 16:38 |
|
Targas are better anyway